fredriklofter.com Twitter Facebook LinkedIn

Reflections

Getting it right

by on Oct.20, 2010, under Reflections

“I believe in the supreme width of the individual and in his right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. I believe that every right implies a responsibility, every opportunity, an obligation; every possession a duty.

I believe that the law was made for man and not man for the law; that government is the servant of the people and not their master.

I believe in the dignity of labor, whether with head or hand; that the world owes no man a living but it owes every man an opportunity to make a living.

I believe that thrift is essential to well-ordered living and that economy is a prime request of a sound financial structure, whether in government, business or personal affairs.

I believe in the sacredness of a promise, that a man’s word should be as good as his bond; that character – not wealth or power or position – is of supreme worth.

I believe that the rendering of useful service is the common duty of mankind and that only in the purifying fire of sacrifice is the dross (waste matter) of selfishness consumed and the greatness of the human soul set free.

[..]

I believe that love is the greatest thing in the world; that it alone can overcome hate; that right can and will triumph over might.”

– John D. Rockefeller, Jr.

Comments Off on Getting it right :, , more...

Om en ful gammal vana

by on Oct.19, 2010, under Reflections

Vi har redan sedan rätt lång tid tillbaka ett vänsterextremistiskt parti i Sveriges Riksdag. Ett parti med antidemokratiska rötter. Ett parti som för inte så länge sedan stod för en ideologi som stödde mord och förtryck på miljontals människor. Ett parti vars anhängare tyckte (och antagligen fortfarande tycker) att Josef Stalin var en rätt schysst kille. Ett parti som sedan dess ansträngt sig hårt för att framstå i bättre dager och numera sträcker sig så långt att man till och med säger sig omfamna den demokratiska ideologin. Det bakomliggande lyser dock igenom ändå. Partiets ledare har i decennier stått på diktaturens sida och gick nyligen och uppenbart motvilligt ur svensk-kubanska föreningen. Framträdare för partiet kallar sig öppet för kommunister och är med i vänföreningar med diktaturer.

Så varför ses detta som mer rumsrent än ett högerextremistiskt parti? Varför blir folk upprörda över att Sverigedemokraterna har tagit sig in i Sveriges Riksdag? Vad är det som drar tusentals människor till Sergels Torg för att demonstrera (och exakt vad är det de demonstrerar mot?)? Vänsterpartiet är ju uppenbart värre då de trots allt har närmre till kommunismen än vad Sverigedemokraterna har till nazismen. Jag menar inte att vi måste behandla Sverigedemokraterna som ett rumsrent parti utan snarare att vi heller inte kan behandla Vänsterpartiet som ett sådant.

Trist nog verkar vi vara vana vid att ha kommunister i Sveriges Riksdag, kanske för att de under lång tid figurerat som stödparti till de en gång så dominerande socialdemokraterna. Det är uppenbart en gammal ful vana.

Comments Off on Om en ful gammal vana : more...

My favorite road sign

by on Sep.21, 2010, under Reflections

Slippery when wet

Also being the name of an excellent Bon Jovi album, this road sign is my all-time favorite and I finally managed to capture a picture of it with my camera. This one is from the Manhattan side of the Brooklyn bridge.

Comments Off on My favorite road sign :, , more...

Med alla till buds stående medel bekämpas

by on Sep.17, 2010, under Reflections

Författaren och journalisten Jan Guillou lär ha sagt att den svenska avundsjukan är djupare rotad än sexualdriften. Han syftar uppenbart på Jantelagen, Sveriges akilleshäl, en lag som den dansknorske författaren Aksel Sandemose formulerade 1933 i sin bok En flykting korsar sitt spår. Så, kära svensk, det är så här ditt liv ser ut:

  • Du ska inte tro att du är något.
  • Du ska inte tro att du är lika god som vi.
  • Du ska inte tro att du är klokare än vi.
  • Du ska inte inbilla dig att du är bättre än vi.
  • Du ska inte tro att du vet mer än vi.
  • Du ska inte tro att du är mer förmer än vi.
  • Du ska inte tro att du duger till något.
  • Du ska inte skratta åt oss.
  • Du ska inte tro att någon bryr sig om dig.
  • Du ska inte tro att du kan lära oss något.

Patetiskt. Småaktigt. Instängt. Ointelligent. Träffsäkert och väldigt, väldigt svenskt. Dessutom vet du ju att det är sant, om du bara tänker efter lite. Du känner det på dig. Du vet det. Du måste lyfta dig upp ur det. Stå över det. Ta tag i det. Sopa bort det. Bekämpa det. Inse att det är OK att lyckas i livet och unna dina medmänniskor framgång – oavsett om det handlar om respekt, karriär, makt eller pengar. Det betyder inte att du inte kan lyckas också – bara att du själv i så fall måste ta tag i det. Det är ditt ansvar – ingen annan kommer att göra det åt dig. Lycka till med det!

Comments Off on Med alla till buds stående medel bekämpas :, , , more...

Only in America

by on Sep.08, 2010, under Reflections

I took this picture in Central Park, NYC a few Saturdays ago and… …I can’t find words for how funny this is: nowhere else would anyone dream of putting a dog (an ugly one too) in a stroller and take the two to the park. Look at how satisfied the owner is. Click to enlarge.

Comments Off on Only in America :, , more...

Beträffande statliga plansocialistiska försäljningsmonopol

by on Sep.08, 2010, under Reflections

Hur kan det komma sig att jag som fullvärdig, fri (dock hårt taxerad) svensk medborgare tvingas finna mig i att stå med kölapp och mössa i hand för att få köpa en flaska vin? Fortfarande. År 2010. 15 år efter att vi sent omsider gick med i EU. Det finns absolut risker med alkohol och det är trist och tråkigt, i synnerhet när det drabbar andra, men det är ju knappast så att vi – trots hårda restriktioner – är befriade från detta i Sverige. Åk till valfritt Systembolag (gärna där de är placerade i närheten av T-banan, t.ex. Hornstull) och se efter själv. Här tycker jag det blir intressant att titta på måluppfyllnadsgrad, dvs. hur länge har vi haft försäljningsmonopol i Sverige och hur kommer det sig att vi inte är ett dugg bättre än andra länder på att hantera alkoholmissbruk? Tvärtom brukar framförallt svenska ungdomar sticka ut i statistiken över länder med alkoholrelaterade problem (och sett till minderåriga vad är det som garanterar att Systembolaget gör den kontrollen bättre än någon annan? – det finns ju ganska gott om exempel på när nämnda monopol ertappats med att sälja alkohol till just minderåriga). Så varför ska vi som inte har problem med alkohol tvingas stå ut med sämre service (tillgänglighet, öppettider)? Statliga monopol äger inget existensberättigande i ett fritt, demokratiskt samhälle. Det är dags att kliva ur ankdammen nu, Sverige, det är hög tid att förpassa de sista DDR-relikerna till historien och Systembolaget toppar listan.

Detta inlägg har även publicerats i Svenska Dagbladet i en något förkortad version som ett svar på en annan insändare (texten ovan var den som skickades in).

Comments Off on Beträffande statliga plansocialistiska försäljningsmonopol :, , more...

Positivt för vem?

by on Sep.07, 2010, under Reflections

Kvotering, eller "positiv särbehandling", är en förskönande omskrivning för en vilja att på ett legitimt sätt och på falska grunder gynna någon eller några som inte på egna meriter själva klarar att nå en viss position i samhället. Positivt för vem? Samhället putsar på statistiken och kan säga att "vi har minsann X% av den och den minoriteten inom den och den samhällssektorn". Till vilket syfte då? I själva verket är hela angreppssättet självdestruktivt för ett samhälle av den enkla anledningen att den person som var bäst lämpad för jobbet inte fick det. Det brukar till och med ekonomer förstå. Sett ur ett litet större perspektiv växer problemet ytterligare med detta angreppssätt genom att mer meriterade personer får sina karriärer åsidosatta i denna "positiva" anda. De har all rätt att ifrågasätta denna politik.

Detta inlägg publicerades också i Svenska Dagbladet den 15:e juni 2002.

Comments Off on Positivt för vem? :, , more...

My recent American (re-)discoveries

by on Sep.01, 2010, under Reflections

Don’t get me wrong. I love America. Whenever I visit, I feel right at home and that I belong. INS/DHS records will show that I am a frequent and regular visitor (or, if you prefer, “legal alien”) and my year as a foreign exchange student grants me the lifelong title Former Volunteer American (with all its privileges). It’s just that Americans do some things a little… …different than the rest of us. Not wrong, but not necessarily right either. Just different. Different can be good and different can be downright funny. Here’s a few examples of what I mean:

  • Americans play football with their hands. While hilarious and extremely difficult not to laugh at, this somewhat more padded version of rugby is in fact, once you get to know the game, very entertaining and much more strategic than what meets the eye. But to call it football?! There’s not even a ball involved, is there? Padded Rugby, Toss the Bean or Beantoss all seem like more appropriate names. Feel free to adapt! For the love of the game.
  • Few people in America eat with a knife and fork and of those who do the approach where the food is first processed into tiny food cubes which are then consumed one-at-a-time using the fork only (then shifted from left to right hand) dominates. Baaaaad manners! How do you get to respect a person (maybe even do business together) who doesn’t eat with a knife and fork?
  • While often being the subject of debate, it is apparent that America wouldn’t last ten minutes without its vast illegal immigrant work force (Mexico being overrepresented) and that this labor – by European standards – is dirt cheap. How else can there, on any given day, be more store attendants/sales advisors than customers in a typical Footlocker store? People who’s job description essentially consists of “arrange lines” (which, by the way, most of the time is done superbly). Being guests at a more upper class restaurant in NYC recently, we noticed that even the waitor had assistants (notice the plural). Unbelievable. And yet we read about self-appointed sherriffs – complete with sidearms – patroling the southern border in the hunt for illegal immigrants, the same illegal immigrants who – like it or not – constitute a cornerstone of the American society. If illegal immigrants are so unwanted, how come it is possible to work, live, go to school (!), see the doctor, etc. in America (as long, ofcourse, as you pay for it) without blowing the cover of your (non-existing) immigration status and face immediate deportation? America wants you. America needs you. They just don’t know it yet.
  • Tipping is not included. Becoming more and more common, restaurants nowadays typically add 15-20% “gratuity” to your restaurant bill. The reason is obvious. No other country in the world has the tipping culture that America has and, consequently, America has somewhat of a problem explaining (in a begging but yet non-begging way) to visitors that the price on the check is actually not the price but in fact something else (much lower). Let’s face it: if American employers would pay their employees decent salaries, this wouldn’t be a problem.
  • The size of the portions served at restaurants is… well, they are unbelievably big; to an extent that it becomes ridiculous. Appetizers are generally a small serving of food served before the main course, but imagine that the appetizer is so big that there is no room for a main course to get my point. Or that the side sallad is served on a full size plate and would easily go for a main course in Europe. Finally presented with your main course, it is all too obvious that the size of the serving is obese in itself and that even if you take the dog into consideration (their favorite excuse) there is enough food on your plate to feed a school class. See a problem, anyone?
  • American beer has a far nastier reputation than it deserves. While there are still plenty of undrinkable crap (like Bud Light) in circulation, good American beer actually do exist (and I’m not talking about semi-drinkable beer, like Miller) in for instance Samuel Adams from the Boston Beer Company (who even have the good sense of complying with the German reinheitsgebot of 1486) or Brooklyn Lager. It’s just that you rarely see Americans drink it. While still funny, the following old joke may simply not apply anymore: Q: “What does American beer and making love in a canoe have in common?” A: “It’s fucking close to water.”
  • While we’re on the subject of beverages, American coffee deserves a special note. Everywhere else in the world a coffee Americano is known as a brew consisting of hot water in a cup being brought in to the same room as one coffee bean for a maximum period of 30 seconds. It’s see through. Looking down at your obligatory cup of coffee at any given hotel breakfast in America you can actually see the bottom of the cup. Yes! Really! Coffee is not supposed to be see through. If it is you didn’t do it right. When my mom – a coffee drinker of rank – visited me in America she brought instant coffee from Sweden “to compensate things”; she would ask for a desert spoon in the restaurant and then bring up her instant coffee which she kept in a pill jar (my dad is a pharmacist) in her purse and spoon up her coffee to a drinkable standard. It’s that bad.
  • Driving in America is simple and straightforward. Roads generally hold very high standards, although toll roads exist (make up your mind: either collect through taxes or by use – not both), everything is well signed and parking is a breeze (both in finding parking spots and in the size of them – most will fit a regular sized boat and still have plenty of room to spare). They used exit numbers several decades before us. But only a short distance outside the downtown area of any American city your are expected to drive a car. Walking is unheard of and public transportation is both severely underdeveloped and generally regarded as very suspicious. I once walked from home to the local Kroger’s for groceries, a distance of 2km/1.2mi, and more than one car stopped and asked me what the problem was (in very friendly ways). To Europeans, that is very funny. But then in Europe there were first cities, and then came cars. It’s the other way around in America.
  • Hotels in America generally also hold a very high standard. It’s far, far ahead of France or Britain where that indiscreet smell of dogshit and mould tend to greet you (I travel a lot so don’t argue with me on this one). Irons and newspaper to your door is standard, of course. However, breakfast and wifi are generally not included in the price and especially the more upper class hotels will try to rip you off on wifi while it’s free and fast(er) down on the corner at Starbucks (or even in the lobby). Most retailers in America also carry free wifi, but not only out of respect for your integrity. Another thing to be aware of is when it says “continental breakfast” which in America translates to coffee and donuts…
  • When most countries have tried to unify standards, America stands out as our not-that-standard (and not-that-interested either, for that matter) neighbor in the west. It takes a while to get used to their old school measurement system (pounds, feet, ounces, etc.) that no one else uses and once you do you can’t help but wonder why they don’t simply abandon it. Immediately. Learn from the Canadians! It’ll be worth the effort, trust me. They have even kept the “AM” / “PM” way of indicating time of day and refer to the 24h clock used in the rest of the world as “military time”…
  • Americans understand and appreciate the concept of comfortable better than most of us, and consequently there are cupholders to be found literally everywhere which, ofcourse, is outstanding. A clear sign that the bartender has spotted you as European is when he/she asks if you’d like a glass to go with your beer. It’s with beer glasses as it is with knives and forks; few Americans use them. But it also hits on the American dress code which is, shall we say, casual. Men dress in oversized suits and expect to be taken seriously and women wear sneakers with their dresses. Show up at the hotel breakfast in your sweatpants or gym clothes? Wear your baseball hat inside? No problem in America.
  • Online banking in America means that you generate a check on the bank’s website and then you print it on your own printer and post it to the recipient by snail mail. For real. No, seriously. This is not a joke. A check?! In 2010?! Please don’t tell me you use fax machines too? Exactly how online is this approach? And here we thought they were civilized…
  • Although legend has it that the first credit cards saw daylight in America, their use is peculiar enough very limited in your everyday life. Cash is king, although most department stores and restaurants will normally accept credit cards (don’t be deterred when the cashier brings up the 1950s style carbon-copy card reader from some disclosed corner of the counter beneath the cash machine). But not taxis, McDonald’s or the newsstand down on the corner. No chance. Forget it. Not even American Express. Not even in 2010. Retarded. Unexpected.
  • One thing I particularly like with America is the fact that the price on the price tags states the price of the commodity excluding taxes. I admit that this was annoying at first, but it’s actually very good as it makes the size of the tax burden transparent. Everyone will immediately become very aware of a tax increase, a fact that most people find very appealing. On top of that, it gives you a math exercise everytime you buy something.
Comments Off on My recent American (re-)discoveries :, more...

Looking for something?

Google is your friend. All smart people use Google. Use the form below to search the site:

Custom Search

Visit my friends!

A few highly recommended friends...

Archives